Commentary: community partnered research: driving sensemaking, managing knowledge, and moving mental health care to new heights.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Longstanding gaps between research and practice, research and policy, and policy and practice impede the sustainability of high-quality health services delivery and often inadvertently contribute to disparities in healthcare access, processes, and outcomes. Why do these gaps exist? Explanations embrace multiple reasons and acknowledge the interactions between factors such as financing and organization of health care; attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge of patients, families, providers and policymakers; and the research or evidence base for decisionmaking. To complicate matters, these factors are in constant change. For high disease-burden conditions, such as mental disorders, which also have an early age of onset, a traditionally and predominantly linear biomedical/healthcare research process—from basic science to clinical treatment innovations to effectiveness and services research—is insufficient to meet both today’s suffering and tomorrow’s sustainability of innovative changes. Fortunately, new initiatives from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) offer opportunities for multilevel change in the medical research enterprise. From NIH’s Roadmap Initiatives, two parts are relevant to work with communities, research teams of the future and re-engineering the clinical research enterprise (nihroadmap.nih.gov). The articles in this special issue represent bold examples for those two initiatives by extending the role and work of communities and not just limiting that work to patient communities or community-based providers. The work here, in no uncertain terms, cogently and potently demonstrates who else can and should be part of a research team. Fortunately, the recent trans-NIH program announcement on community-based participatory research is a preliminary but correct step in these directions. The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) has a long history of concern and action related to community participatory work and health disparities in racial/ethnic populations as well as other underrepresented groups (ie, women, children, disabled) in order to fulfill its mission. In particular, the services research initiatives over the past few years have lead the way in a commitment to true community partnerships, realizing that the work must go where the people live and work day to day. Housed in the Division of Services and Interventions Research are such items as: N research programs in health disparities, sociocultural work, and dissemination and implementation; N program announcements to build research infrastructure, through sustainable partnerships, in communities to take advantage of real-world and real-time changes and study them; N recent special initiatives to ready state mental-health systems to implement evidence-based practices and efforts to study readiness; and N workshops bringing together intervention and services researchers with academic management experts who study strategic and organizational change.
منابع مشابه
Applying KT Network Complexity to a Highly-Partnered Knowledge Transfer Effort; Comment on “Using Complexity and Network Concepts to Inform Healthcare Knowledge Translation”
The re-conceptualization of knowledge translation (KT) in Kitson and colleagues’ manuscript “Using Complexity and Network Concepts to Inform Healthcare Knowledge Translation” is an advancement in how one can incorporate implementation into the KT process. Kitson notes that “the challenge is to explain how it might help in the healthcare policy, practice, and research communities.” We propose th...
متن کاملWhen Coproduction Is Unproductive; Comment on “Experience of Health Leadership in Partnering with University-Based Researchers in Canada: A Call to ‘Re-Imagine’ Research”
Bowen et al offer a sobering look at the reality of research partnerships from the decision-maker perspective. Health leaders who had actively engaged in such partnerships continued to describe research as irrelevant and unhelpful – just the problem that partnered research was intended to solve. This commentary further examines the many barriers that impede researchers ...
متن کاملPerceptions of Community Involvement in the Peruvian Mental Health Reform Process Among Clinicians and Policy-Makers: A Qualitative Study
Background The global burden of mental health conditions has led to the implementation of new models of care for persons with mental illness. Recent mental health reforms in Peru include the implementation of a community mental health model (CMHM) that, among its core objectives, aims to provide care in the community through specialized facilities, the community mental health centers (CMH...
متن کاملCommunity-based partnered research: new directions in mental health services research.
OBJECTIVE Community-based participatory research has the potential to improve implementation of best practices to reduce disparities but has seldom been applied in mental health services research. This article presents the content and lessons learned from a national conference designed to stimulate such an application. DESIGN Mental health program developers collaborated in hosting a two-day ...
متن کاملThe Development and Initial Validation of the Perinatal Mental Health Awareness Scale in Student Midwives
Background & aim: Perinatal mental health problems have been demonstrated to impact upon maternal, and fetal/child outcomes. Despite the global evidence and a policy-driven responsibility for identification of these problems, research demonstrates that student midwives/midwives lack knowledge and confidence to assess, identify, and manage them. A similar context is evident for learning disabili...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Ethnicity & disease
دوره 16 1 Suppl 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006